Not science for the sake of science
​Science for the sake of us.

4Love and Science
  • PLATFORM
  • PORTFOLIO
  • PEOPLE

Principles of Community Design

11/15/2014

0 Comments

 
Attended a great workshop today on Principles of Community design hosted by The Living Systems Institute (LSI).

It was a very open format discussion based day working off of 33 main principles.  Everyone got 2 principles and we rotated around speaking what we thought that principles meant to us and what we were doing in our communities. 

In effect, we became the power point!

Major points that stuck with me:

-The whole format was like a putting together a mosaic.  Unlike in linear thinking where an idea grows from simple to complex, we instead assembled many concepts and let the bigger picture emerge organically.

-Outside of the financial market value system which is based on scarcity, another metric of value is in creating new interactions.  Interactions where people can transfer resources, information, emotional support.  Made me think of entropy.  The natural system favors more interactions.  More possibilities.  More mixing. Just as John Warner said, we need to embrace the chaos.

-We may only need simple things like food and shelter to survive, but we need a few others to THRIVE.  David Braden, facilitator listed 5 elements for human thriving :
        -Food
        -Shelter
        -Clothing
        -Healthcare
        -Education


Picture

A lot of these ideas come from the practice of Permaculture:

(From Wikipedia)

Permaculture is a branch of ecological design, ecological engineering, environmental design, construction and integrated water resources management that develops sustainable architecture, regenerative and self-maintained habitat and agricultural systems modeled from natural ecosystems.



I love these workshops because they help me to build new vocabulary to help address limitations in the current scientific paradigm.  So much of facilitating  thought-provoking discussions  is about introducing new language.  It allows us to be more concise in our definitions and more dynamic in our solutions.  Feeling lucky to have the resources of such an insightful community.
0 Comments

What is an Appropriate Technology?

10/28/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
This past weekend I attended a workshop hosted by the Denver Permaculture Guild.  The topic was Defining and Sharing Appropriate Technology.  When I saw the event posted on facebook I thought it amazingly fortuitous.  Once again, finding exactly the conversations I want to be having.

The event was held at the Posner Center for International Development , a very swanky renovated warehouse, ripe with a collaborative office set up (lots of different companies sharing the space).

We began our discussion with introductions and it seemed most people had an interest in agricultural sustainability and ecological conservation.  As we started defining appropriate technology it naturally was described in this sort of context.  Definitions involved:
-Reducing/eliminating pollution
-reuse and recycle of materials
-building bottom up, starting from scratch with available materials
-supportive of non-growth economy
-cultivating other types of capital besides financial, ie Social Capital

For me I define Appropriate Technology as tools that have been ethically evaluated for social benefit of the community.  And, maybe 'social benefit' is loaded, but I think it comes down to just actually having the conversation.  "What could be some of the positive and negative impacts on society?  "What will the manufacturing of such a technology require?" "How does this change us as human beings"  Because ultimately, every tool or technology is an extension of human evolution (IMO), and so should we be constantly evaluating what we want that to look like? 

We then brainstormed a few different scales to use in analysing 'appropriateness'.  (added some of my own, isolative?....maybe should be isolating)
Picture
I think th e key here is finding where the technology should lie on the scale based on factors such as quality of life and accessibilty of resources.  Not that one side is better than the other or that one is even practically achievable.  I found it to be a good thought-povoking tool that could be used in future scientific ethics conversations.

Hope that more workshops like these will be happening in the future.  Thanks Denver Permaculture!
0 Comments

    Author

    Kendra is the founder of 4Love+Science and works as a Science and Community Consultant

    Archives

    June 2018
    April 2018
    November 2017
    June 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    April 2016
    December 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    Appropriate Technology
    Brainstorm
    Collaboration
    Community
    Community Design
    Community Radio
    Community Science
    Entropy
    How On Earth
    Katharine Hayhoe
    Living Systems Institute
    Permaculture
    Placemaking
    Radio
    Salon
    Science
    Science And Religion
    Science And Society
    Science And Spirituality
    Science Philosophy

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • PLATFORM
  • PORTFOLIO
  • PEOPLE